On 7/27/2017 11:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Because it isn't always correct to use EAPOL to check 4-way,
we add a timer to handle exception.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Birming Chiu <birming@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shaofu <shaofu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Steven Ting <steventing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/base.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/base.c
@@ -1408,6 +1408,11 @@ u8 rtl_is_special_data(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 is_tx,
return true;
} else if (ETH_P_PAE == ether_type) {
+ /* EAPOL is seens as in-4way */
+ rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way = true;
+ rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way_ts = jiffies;
+ rtlpriv->btcoexist.btc_info.in_4way_ts = jiffies;
+
RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, (COMP_SEND | COMP_RECV), DBG_DMESG,
"802.1X %s EAPOL pkt!!\n", (is_tx) ? "Tx" : "Rx");
The indentation looks wrong.
That wrongly indented line seems a bit redundant anyway :-p
Regards,
Arend
