On 18.07.2017 09:14, Ryan Hsu wrote:
On 07/16/2017 03:56 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
Can ath10k_warn() be ath10k_dbg() there ? Maybe this ?
Looks good to me.
From d4138d936635ca7b69ed7f7b0cda4914f0f07917 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabriel Craciunescu <nix.or.die@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:45:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ath10k_htt_rx_amsdu_allowed(): change ath10k_warn() to th10k_dbg()
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Craciunescu <nix.or.die@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
index 398dda978d6e..ad0306cd6ee1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
@@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ static bool ath10k_htt_rx_amsdu_allowed(struct ath10k *ar,
*/
if (!rx_status->freq) {
- ath10k_warn(ar, "no channel configured; ignoriframe(s)!\n");
+ ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_HTT, "no channel configured, ignoring frame(s)!\n");
return false;
}
Can you send this as patch for reviewing, please?
Sure .. I'll try to send the patch to the list later on today..
Regards,
Gabriel C
