On 07/16/2017 03:56 PM, Gabriel C wrote:
>
> Can ath10k_warn() be ath10k_dbg() there ? Maybe this ?
>
Looks good to me.
>
> From d4138d936635ca7b69ed7f7b0cda4914f0f07917 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Gabriel Craciunescu <nix.or.die@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:45:29 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] ath10k_htt_rx_amsdu_allowed(): change ath10k_warn() to th10k_dbg()
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Craciunescu <nix.or.die@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> index 398dda978d6e..ad0306cd6ee1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c
> @@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ static bool ath10k_htt_rx_amsdu_allowed(struct ath10k *ar,
> */
>
> if (!rx_status->freq) {
> - ath10k_warn(ar, "no channel configured; ignoriframe(s)!\n");
> + ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_HTT, "no channel configured, ignoring frame(s)!\n");
> return false;
> }
>
Can you send this as patch for reviewing, please?
--
Ryan Hsu
