Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 16:51 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >> But this does not mean that the gates are open for all possible hacks >> via vendor commands, we still want to have generic nl80211 interface >> for all normal functionality. Just to give some examples of something >> which is NOT acceptable: > > [snip scanning] > >> * power save settings >> * btcoex settings > > I'm starting to think that these might really be a vendor API for > anything but the most basic features - there's so much variation here > now. > > OTOH, much of these shouldn't really be something the user needs to > twiddle with anyway. Yeah, for example power save is something which should just work. But btcoex settings so seem to be quite hairy sometimes, so maybe a vendor interface is justifiable. Dunno. -- Kalle Valo
