On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Tomas Winkler <tomasw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:>> Tor Håkon Haugen wrote:>>>>>> John W. Linville wrote:>>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:35:23PM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:>>>>> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:59 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:>>>>>> Honestly I'm tempted to change it to "enable_hw_scan" instead...>>>>> Give the advantages, I'd like to use it if we can fix the bug (I haven't>>>>> seen what the bug is myself). But you are free to change the default>>>>> value until it is fixed. There is no such problem for 4965, right?>>>> AFAICT only the 3945 seems to need it.>>>>>>>>>> I can confirm that this also applies to 4965 as a friend of mine has>>> this card. According to him the card works a lot better with the>>> parameters "swcrypto=1" and "disable_hw_scan=1".>>>> Just to make it clear,>> iwl3945 doesn't work at all without disable_hw_scan=1 here.>> The driver just shuts down thee card since it detects microcode error.>>>> It looks like this is all caused by the big rate, band patch. Looks> like A band scan channels are not configured correctly for the> scanning. This crashes the firmware.
Why would this crash firmware?
Luis��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
