On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Tor Håkon Haugen wrote: >> >> John W. Linville wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 03:35:23PM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:59 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >>>>> Honestly I'm tempted to change it to "enable_hw_scan" instead... >>>> Give the advantages, I'd like to use it if we can fix the bug (I haven't >>>> seen what the bug is myself). But you are free to change the default >>>> value until it is fixed. There is no such problem for 4965, right? >>> AFAICT only the 3945 seems to need it. >>> >> >> I can confirm that this also applies to 4965 as a friend of mine has >> this card. According to him the card works a lot better with the >> parameters "swcrypto=1" and "disable_hw_scan=1". > > Just to make it clear, > iwl3945 doesn't work at all without disable_hw_scan=1 here. > The driver just shuts down thee card since it detects microcode error. > It looks like this is all caused by the big rate, band patch. Looks like A band scan channels are not configured correctly for the scanning. This crashes the firmware. Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
