On 5/12/2017 10:54 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 5/12/2017 10:19 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Xie Qirong <cheerx1994@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
The combination of init_timer and setting up the data and function field
manually is equivalent to calling setup_timer(). This is an api
consolidation only and improves readability.
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xie Qirong <cheerx1994@xxxxxxxxx>
---
setup_timer.cocci suggested the following improvement:
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/btcoex.c:383:1-11: Use
setup_timer function for function on line 384.
Patch was compile checked with: x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=y +
CONFIG_BRCMFMAC_USB=y + CONFIG_BRCMFMAC_PCIE=y + CONFIG_BRCM_TRACING=y +
CONFIG_BRCMDBG=y
Kernel version: 4.11.0 (localversion-next is next-20170512)
How is this different from the first version?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9709467/
Hi Kalle,
This is actually the third version. You are referring to the
not-specifically-named "v2" here, but how are you to know ;-)
Exactly :)
This third version is the same as v1 on which I commented to put the
coccinelle output in the commit message. So I would still keep v2 if
nothing else changed in v3 apart from my Acked-by: tag.
Ok, but I can easily take v3 (ie. this one) so that you get credit ;)
If you add the coccinelle output in the commit message, ie. above the
'---' that would be great. So for both you have to do additional stuff
provided you find it useful to have the coccinelle output. :-p
Regards,
Arend
