Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 5/12/2017 10:19 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Xie Qirong <cheerx1994@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> The combination of init_timer and setting up the data and function field >>> manually is equivalent to calling setup_timer(). This is an api >>> consolidation only and improves readability. >>> >>> Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Xie Qirong <cheerx1994@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> setup_timer.cocci suggested the following improvement: >>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/btcoex.c:383:1-11: Use >>> setup_timer function for function on line 384. >>> >>> Patch was compile checked with: x86_64_defconfig + CONFIG_BRCMFMAC=y + >>> CONFIG_BRCMFMAC_USB=y + CONFIG_BRCMFMAC_PCIE=y + CONFIG_BRCM_TRACING=y + >>> CONFIG_BRCMDBG=y >>> >>> Kernel version: 4.11.0 (localversion-next is next-20170512) >> >> How is this different from the first version? >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9709467/ > > Hi Kalle, > > This is actually the third version. You are referring to the > not-specifically-named "v2" here, but how are you to know ;-) Exactly :) > This third version is the same as v1 on which I commented to put the > coccinelle output in the commit message. So I would still keep v2 if > nothing else changed in v3 apart from my Acked-by: tag. Ok, but I can easily take v3 (ie. this one) so that you get credit ;) -- Kalle Valo