On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:59:12PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: [...] > Heh. I think I really want to solve - at least partially - nla_parse() > to see that it can be done this way. It'd be nice to even transform all > the callers (I generated half of these patches with spatch anyway) to > have at least that. We can just have a modified version of nla_parse that deals with this. We can probably use struct nla_policy to place the extended error code or the string (as we discussed I don't need string errors, but I'm fine if other people find it useful). Thanks!
