On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 10:36 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > > > I'm not really sure what to do - we don't really want to print a > > message on something that might have been received from the peer, I > > think? Though I suppose we should return 0 for the invalid > > combinations, indicating that they're not supported. > > Ah. This is all non-functional code yet, right? At least having a > static non-inline function in ieee80211.h will give build issues I > would think. No, I marked it __maybe_unused so it'll be fine. I didn't want to have it inlined if you use it multiple times in a single source file, but I didn't want to move it to somewhere else either ... > Anyway, I would indeed return 0 and have caller deal with that. Yeah, I'll do that. johannes