> Is it fine to have something like this > > 1) We can have this btcoex_priority value as a optional value in > btcoex enable command like below > > iw phyX btcoex_state <enable| disable> [prirority(vendor spcific > value)] > > 2) Or we can have seperate command for btcoex_priority as below > > iw phyX set btcoex_priority <priority (vendor spcific value)> > > Hopefully this will get rid off all the nl80211 bits. That makes no sense. If the bits are vendor specific, then there's no value in having this as an nl80211 command (rather than a vendor command) to start with. You need to understand that I'm differentiating between *capability* bits and actual *priority setting* bits - please re-read the thread with that in mind. johannes
