Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 2/4] cfg80211: Add new NL80211_CMD_SET_BTCOEX_PRIORITY to support BTCOEX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Johannes,

Thank you for the reply.

On 2017-01-05 19:08, Johannes Berg wrote:
> IOW - why have all these bits rather than just one?

Hardware supports data across all the access categories, this is
just  meant for prioritising the traffic. f.e, If the fw/target has
both wlan and bt traffic queued and if VO is  set as priority, then
wlan VO packets will be pushed out of the radio first and then the bt
traffic.

Exactly. So as far as *capabilities* are concerned, why do we need so
many bits?

Is it fine to have something like this

1) We can have this btcoex_priority value as a optional value in btcoex enable command like below

iw phyX btcoex_state <enable| disable> [prirority(vendor spcific value)]

2) Or we can have seperate command for btcoex_priority as below

iw phyX set btcoex_priority <priority (vendor spcific value)>

Hopefully this will get rid off all the nl80211 bits.

Kindly suggest your thoughts.

Thanks,
Tamizh.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux