On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 15:20 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > It seems there has already > > been taken a shot at this which may be used/extended [1]. > > > > That's a good point - it's somewhat similar. > > This is obviously a different context - offloaded BSS selection vs. > scheduled scan (for host BSS selection), but perhaps the attribute & > definitions could be reused? Yes, similar but not quite the same. The existing case is for finding BSSs that are worth waking the host up for (while disconnected), so it needs to be better than the RSSI passed (absolute number). Now this is about relative RSSI as compared to the current connection, so RELATIVE_RSSI is different than RSSI and I think the same attribute should not be used, to avoid confusion. -- Luca.
