> + if (wiphy->min_sched_scan_plan_interval && > + request->scan_plans[i].interval < > + wiphy->min_sched_scan_plan_interval) > + return -EINVAL; > I'm not sure we should break the API that way - just move it up if it's smaller? johannes
> + if (wiphy->min_sched_scan_plan_interval && > + request->scan_plans[i].interval < > + wiphy->min_sched_scan_plan_interval) > + return -EINVAL; > I'm not sure we should break the API that way - just move it up if it's smaller? johannes