On 20-9-2016 16:36, Luca Coelho wrote: > Hi Arend, > > On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 14:29 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote: >> On 20-9-2016 13:45, Beker, Ayala wrote: >>> I don't think there is something in common to those interface types >>> that can fit such a function semantically, so I decided not to >>> change it. >>> Do you have any idea? >> >> What is common is that these are both non-netdev interface types. > > I tend to agree with you. I also thought about an > ieee80211_has_netdev() function for this, but I didn't check whether > this was exactly what we need... Maybe it does not fit all instances, but quite a few checks are there to skip netdev related stuff. > In any case, do you mind if we address this in a separate patch? Fine by me. Regards, Arend > -- > Cheers, > Luca. >
