Hi Arend, On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 14:29 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 20-9-2016 13:45, Beker, Ayala wrote: > > I don't think there is something in common to those interface types > > that can fit such a function semantically, so I decided not to > > change it. > > Do you have any idea? > > What is common is that these are both non-netdev interface types. I tend to agree with you. I also thought about an ieee80211_has_netdev() function for this, but I didn't check whether this was exactly what we need... In any case, do you mind if we address this in a separate patch? -- Cheers, Luca.
