> >> However, the function looks quite innocent, and I cannot see > >> any imbalance there. Did I oversee something or is that a > >> problem of sparse? > > > >> spin_lock_irq(&priv->driver_lock); > >> priv->infra_open = 0; > >> netif_stop_queue(dev); > >> spin_unlock_irq(&priv->driver_lock); > > > > I think it's a sparse problem caused by my patch, I sent further patches > > to fix it but they were never applied (and had a slight remaining > > problem too). If you look at the pre-processed function it should become > > obvious. > > > > I got plenty of this in the mac80211 reported with newest sparse, but > they looks false caused by 'goto statements' Probably similar issues. I have patches that haven't been applied and with those, mac80211 is clean except for a new warning from netdevice.h, one that I'll send a patch for in a minute, and the rc-pid algo one. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
