On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 09:37 +0200, Holger Schurig wrote: > After pulling the newest sparse, I got some new sparse warnings > which puzzle me. Here's one of them: > > drivers/net/wireless/libertas/main.c:477:9: warning: context imbalance in 'lbs_eth_stop': wrong count at exit > drivers/net/wireless/libertas/main.c:477:9: context 'lock': wanted 0, got 1 > > However, the function looks quite innocent, and I cannot see > any imbalance there. Did I oversee something or is that a > problem of sparse? > spin_lock_irq(&priv->driver_lock); > priv->infra_open = 0; > netif_stop_queue(dev); > spin_unlock_irq(&priv->driver_lock); I think it's a sparse problem caused by my patch, I sent further patches to fix it but they were never applied (and had a slight remaining problem too). If you look at the pre-processed function it should become obvious. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part