Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > > +static int invoke_tx_handlers(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx)
>> > > +{
>> > > + return invoke_tx_handlers_early(tx) ||
>> > > invoke_tx_handlers_late(tx);
>> > > +}
>> >
>> > Ugh, please, no, don't be tricky where it's not necessary. Now
>> > every
>> > person reading this has to first look up the return type, and then
>> > the
>> > return value, and make sure they understand that success is
>> > actually
>> > the value 0 ... that's way too much to ask.
>>
>> Noted. Any objections to turning these into bool return types?
>
> They have three possible values ... :)
Ah, no, not the handlers themselves. Meant the invoke_tx_handlers()
function (or all three of them after my patch; hence the plural). To
avoid the "0 means true" confusion you alluded to :)
-Toke
