Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> +static int invoke_tx_handlers(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx)
>> +{
>> + return invoke_tx_handlers_early(tx) ||
>> invoke_tx_handlers_late(tx);
>> +}
>
> Ugh, please, no, don't be tricky where it's not necessary. Now every
> person reading this has to first look up the return type, and then the
> return value, and make sure they understand that success is actually
> the value 0 ... that's way too much to ask.
Noted. Any objections to turning these into bool return types?
I'll go through and fix your other comments and send a new version.
Thanks for the feedback :)
-Toke
