> I was in doubt to raise the question first about getting this stuff > consistent, ie. keep rdev-ops as flat as possible, but decided just > to put it out there in patch format. My bad :-) :-) > If you want the rdev-ops to be safe against (future) callers not > checking the callback, it seems you should add a check in all rdev- > ops where the callback is optional. Yeah, perhaps. I don't really mind hugely either way, but I think removing them now would mostly be unwarranted churn. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
