Hi Stephan, Miaoqing Pan,
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 08:41:36AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Montag, 8. August 2016, 02:03:36 CEST schrieb Pan, Miaoqing:
> > The entropy was evaluated by crypto expert, the analysis report show the
> > ADC with at least 10bits and up to 22 bits of min-entropy for a 32 bits
> > value, we conservatively assume the min-entropy is 10 bits out of 32 bits,
> > so that's why set entropy quality to 320/1024 = 10/32.
Ok, so the relevant commit is:
ed14dc0af7cce ath9k: feeding entropy in kernel from ADC capture
Which refers to a previous commit:
6301566e0b2d ath9k: export HW random number generator
> > Also we have explained in the commit message why can't use the HW
> > RNG framework.
>From ed14dc0af7cce:
"""
Since ADC was not designed to be a dedicated HW RNG, we do not want to
bind it to /dev/hwrng framework directly.
"""
> Where is the description of the RNG, where is the test implementation?
> >
> > Otherwise, your patch will cause high CPU load, as continuously read ADC
> > data if entropy bits under write_wakeup_threshold.
>
> The issue is that although you may have analyzed it, others are unable to
> measure the quality of the RNG and assess the design as well as the
> implementation of the RNG. This RNG is the only implementation of a hardware
> RNG that per default and without being able to change it at runtime injects
> data into the input_pool where the noise source cannot be audited. Note, even
> other respected RNG noise sources like the Intel RDRAND will not feed into /
> dev/random per default in a way that dominates all other noise sources.
>
> I would like to be able to deactivate that noise source to the extent that it
> does not cause /dev/random to unblock. The reason is that your noise source
> starts to dominate all other noise sources.
I think the short-term problem here is the config logic:
config ATH9K_HWRNG
bool "Random number generator support"
depends on ATH9K && (HW_RANDOM = y || HW_RANDOM = ATH9K)
default y
If you have *any* hwrngs you want to use and you have an ath9k card
(HW_RANDOM = y and ATH9K != n), you get the behavior Stephan is pointing
out.
Short term, we should just default no here.
> If you think that this patch is a challenge because your driver starts to
> spin, please help and offer another solution.
Well, I don't buy the reasoning listed above for not using the hwrng
framework. Interrupt timings were never designed to be a source of entropy
either. We need to grab it where ever we can find it, especially on
embedded systems. Documentation/hw_random.txt even says:
"""
This data is NOT CHECKED by any fitness tests, and could potentially be
bogus (if the hardware is faulty or has been tampered with).
"""
I really don't think there's a problem with adding these sorts of
sources under char/hw_random/. I think the only thing we would be
concerned about, other than the already addressed entropy estimation,
would be constraining the data rate.
Is ath9k the only wireless card that exposes ADC registers? What about
sound cards?
thx,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
