Hi Kalle, > From: Kalle Valo [mailto:kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 10:54 PM > To: Amitkumar Karwar > Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Cathy Luo; Nishant Sarmukadam; > Xinming Hu > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] mwifiex: process rxba_sync event > > Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > From: Xinming Hu <huxm@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Firmware may filter and drop packets under certain condition, for > > example, ARP SA=DA packet. this event will be used to synchronize the > > Rx Block Acknowledgment (BA) window bitmap and to fill any holes in > > driver side. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <huxm@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > [...] > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/11n_rxreorder.c > > @@ -78,8 +78,15 @@ static int mwifiex_11n_dispatch_amsdu_pkt(struct > mwifiex_private *priv, > > */ > > static int mwifiex_11n_dispatch_pkt(struct mwifiex_private *priv, > > void *payload) { > > - int ret = mwifiex_11n_dispatch_amsdu_pkt(priv, payload); > > > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (payload == (void *)MWIFIEX_RX_PKT_DROPPED_IN_FW) { > > + mwifiex_dbg(priv->adapter, INFO, "info: fw drop data\n"); > > + return 0; > > + } > > [...] > > > + mwifiex_dbg(priv->adapter, ERROR, > > + "drop packet,seq=%d\n", > > + seq_num); > > + > > + ret = mwifiex_11n_rx_reorder_pkt > > + (priv, seq_num, tlv_rxba->tid, > > + tlv_rxba->mac, 0, > > + (void *)MWIFIEX_RX_PKT_DROPPED_IN_FW); > > [...] > > > +/* Indicate packet has been dropped in FW */ > > +#define MWIFIEX_RX_PKT_DROPPED_IN_FW 0xffffffff > > That pointer magic is rather ugly, why not use a proper boolean? > Thanks for review. I will get rid of this macro and submit updated version. Regards, Amitkumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html