Hi Johannes,
>> Are you okay with the general approach?
I see no issues with sending these events out. I'd like them to
actually be reliable (if present) though, not double as you'd implied -
but I didn't really understand in which cases you were expecting
issues, was it only P2P-Device?
That seems to be the only special case. At least I didn't find any
other situations where a NEW_INTERFACE command can be called without a
corresponding net_device being created.
Are there any locking issues I
might be overlooking?
Not that I'm aware of. All of the netdev/wdev handling should be
protected by RTNL.
That was my understanding as well. Thanks.
Okay, let me spin up a v2 with patches 2+3 and 4+5 squished together.
Or do you want one big patch?
Regards,
-Denis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
