Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] rtlwifi: rtl8723ae: Clean up the hardware info routine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/27/2016 04:23 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 10:52 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
This driver contains some complicated if ... else if ... else
constructions.  These are replaced by switch statements to improve
readability.
[]
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c
[]
@@ -1653,132 +1653,134 @@ static void _rtl8723e_read_adapter_info(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
  	rtl8723e_read_bt_coexist_info_from_hwpg(hw,
  			rtlefuse->autoload_failflag, hwinfo);

-	if (rtlhal->oem_id == RT_CID_DEFAULT) {
-		switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_oemid) {
-		case EEPROM_CID_DEFAULT:
-			if (rtlefuse->eeprom_did == 0x8176) {
-				if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6151) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6152) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6154) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6155) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6177) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6178) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6179) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6180) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7151) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7152) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7154) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7155) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7177) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7178) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7179) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7180) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8151) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8152) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8154) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8155) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8181) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8182) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8184) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8185) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9151) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9152) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9154) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9155) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9181) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9182) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9184) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9185))
+	if (rtlhal->oem_id != RT_CID_DEFAULT)
+		return;
+
+	switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_oemid) {
+	case EEPROM_CID_DEFAULT:
+		switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_did) {
+		case 0x8176:
+			switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_svid) {
+			case 0x10EC:
+				switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_smid) {
+				case 0x6151 ... 0x6152:
+				case 0x6154 ... 0x6155:
+				case 0x6177 ... 0x6180:
+				case 0x7151 ... 0x7152:
+				case 0x7154 ... 0x7155:
+				case 0x7177 ... 0x7180:
+				case 0x8151 ... 0x8152:
+				case 0x8154 ... 0x8155:
+				case 0x8181 ... 0x8182:
+				case 0x8184 ... 0x8185:
+				case 0x9151 ... 0x9152:
+				case 0x9154 ... 0x9155:
+				case 0x9181 ... 0x9182:
+				case 0x9184 ... 0x9185:
  					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_TOSHIBA;
-				else if (rtlefuse->eeprom_svid == 0x1025)
-					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_ACER;
-				else if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6191) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6192) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6193) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7191) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7192) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7193) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8191) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8192) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8193) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9191) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9192) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9193))
+					break;
+				case 0x6191 ... 0x6193:
+				case 0x7191 ... 0x7193:
+				case 0x8191 ... 0x8193:
+				case 0x9191 ... 0x9193:
  					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_SAMSUNG;
-				else if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8195) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9195) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7194) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8200) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8201) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8202) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9200))
-					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_LENOVO;
-				else if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8197) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9196))
+					break;
+				case 0x8197:
+				case 0x9196:
  					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_CLEVO;
-				else if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x1028, 0x8194) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x1028, 0x8198) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x1028, 0x9197) ||
-					 CHK_SVID_SMID(0x1028, 0x9198))
+					break;
+				case 0x8203:
+					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_PRONETS;
+					break;
+				case 0x8195:
+				case 0x9195:
+				case 0x7194:
+				case 0x8200 ... 0x8202:
+				case 0x9200:
+					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_LENOVO;
+					break;
+				}

Is this supposed to be a fallthrough?
If so, a comment would be good.
Otherwise is this a missing break?

Good catch. There should be a break here.

+			case 0x1025:
+				rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_ACER;
+				break;
+			case 0x1028:
+				switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_smid) {
+				case 0x8194:
+				case 0x8198:
+				case 0x9197 ... 0x9198:
  					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_DELL;
-				else if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x103C, 0x1629))
+					break;
+				}
+				break;
+			case 0x103C:
+				switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_smid) {
+				case 0x1629:
  					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_HP;
-				else if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x1A32, 0x2315))
+				}
+				break;
+			case 0x1A32:
+				switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_smid) {
+				case 0x2315:
  					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_QMI;
-				else if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8203))
-					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_819X_PRONETS;
-				else if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x1043, 0x84B5))
+					break;
+				}
+				break;
+			case 0x1043:
+				switch (rtlefuse->eeprom_smid) {
+				case 0x84B5:
  					rtlhal->oem_id =
-						 RT_CID_819X_EDIMAX_ASUS;
-				else
-					rtlhal->oem_id = RT_CID_DEFAULT;
-			} else if (rtlefuse->eeprom_did == 0x8178) {
-				if (CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6181) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6182) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6184) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x6185) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7181) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7182) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7184) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x7185) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8181) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8182) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8184) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x8185) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9181) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9182) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9184) ||
-				    CHK_SVID_SMID(0x10EC, 0x9185))
+						RT_CID_819X_EDIMAX_ASUS;

Single line?

Nope - it reaches 81 characters. If that is better than splitting the line, then I will have to comment it to keep from getting several patches changing it back.

Larry

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux