On 4 February 2016 at 13:46, Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Krishna Chaitanya > <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 4 February 2016 at 12:49, Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On 4 February 2016 at 12:22, Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am trying to run some iperf tests using mac80211_hwsim b/w AP and STA. >>>>>> Even after tweaking the routing table, the packets are still not going through >>>>>> mac80211_hwsim instead they are just looping back. >>>>>> >>>>>> After a quick search i found that we should use different network namespaces. >>>>>> Can anyone tell me the exact procedure for this? I have found a procedure >>>>>> in the below link, but i dont have the lxc-unshare for my embedded box. >>>>>> Is there any alternate way for this. >>>>> >>>>> If you have a recent enough iproute2 package you can use: >>>> Unfortunately i dont, will try to get the latest. >>>>> ip netns add ns1 >>>>> ip netns exec ns1 bash # get the PID in the session and don't close it >>>>> iw phy phyX set netns $pid_of_that_shell >>>>> # you can close the bash now; phyX will remain in ns1 >>>>> >>>>> Or you could try using ipv6 link-local addresses which will not >>>>> require you to use namespaces at all. >>>> Tried this but still not able to excite mac80211_hwsim TX path. >>>> below are commands and config. >>>> >>>> wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:00:00:00:00 >>>> inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 >>>> inet6 addr: fe80::ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link >>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >>>> RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:0 >>>> TX packets:38 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >>>> RX bytes:648 (648.0 B) TX bytes:3680 (3.5 KiB) >>>> >>>> wlan1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 02:00:00:00:01:00 >>>> inet addr:20.0.0.1 Bcast:20.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0 >>>> inet6 addr: fe80::ff:fe00:100/64 Scope:Link >>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >>>> RX packets:3 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >>>> TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >>>> RX bytes:126 (126.0 B) TX bytes:808 (808.0 B) >>>> >>>> iperf -s -B fe80::ff:fe00:0 & >>>> iperf -c fe80::ff:fe00:0 -B fe80::ff:fe00:100 -t 60 -i 1 >>>> >>>> Something wrong? >>> >>> For link-local addresses you must specify interface you want to use them. >>> >>> Also, there's an iperf switch to understand ipv6 "-V". >>> >>> iperf -V -i1 -s >>> iperf -V -i1 -c fe80::ff:fe00:0%wlan1 >>> iperf -V -i1 -c fe80::ff:fe00:100%wlan0 >>> >> Thanks a lot Michal. It worked like a charm. > Whenever i use the iperf -c, it starts a bi-directional stream, > How do i limit it to only for single direction? > > # iperf -V -i1 -c fe80::ff:fe00:0%wlan1 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Client connecting to fe80::ff:fe00:0%wlan1, TCP port 5001 > TCP window size: 43.8 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 3] local fe80::ff:fe00:100 port 34808 connected with > fe80::ff:fe00:0 port 5001 > [ 5] local fe80::ff:fe00:0 port 5001 connected with fe80::ff:fe00:100 > port 34808 Hmm.. Are you perhaps running `iperf -V -i1 -s &` (i.e. in the background) with the same stdout as the client :-) You're probably just seeing both the server and the client saying a connection has established at their ends. Michał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
