On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 11:24 +0200, Lior David wrote: > > On 2/2/2016 5:10 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > ...... > > Actually, one more question: Why does the kernel have to know at > > *connect* time that it should be a PBSS? It could tell that from > > the > > scan results, by looking for PBSS if it can't find AP in there, no? > > > Yes it can be implemented that way. However we wanted user space to > be able > to specify exactly whether to connect to an AP or PCP. Since PBSS is > a separate > network type and we don't want clients to get an unexpected > connection to > a PCP. We also don't want to support roaming between a PCP and AP (it > is not > covered by the spec at this time) > ok, fair enough. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
