On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 13:56 +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > On Monday 01 February 2016 13:30:37 Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-02-01 at 13:24 +0100, Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > > The change from cur_tp to the function > > > minstrel_get_tp_avg/minstrel_ht_get_tp_avg changed the unit used > > > for > > > the > > > current throughtput. For example in minstrel_ht the correct > > > conversion between them would be: > > > > > > mrs->cur_tp / 10 == minstrel_ht_get_tp_avg(..). > > > > > > This factor 10 must also be included in the calculation of > > > minstrel_get_expected_throughput and > > > minstrel_ht_get_expected_throughput to > > > get similar results as before the change. > > > > > > > 10 is a pretty expensive factor, perhaps that should use 16 > > instead? > > Not really funny but I will change the title. Huh? Not sure what you mean. I really meant to change 10 to 16 overall as far as the factor is concerned, since division by/multiplication with 16 is far easier in base 2 than by/with 10. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
