On 17 December 2015 at 00:50, Peter Oh <poh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/16/2015 01:54 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: >> On 2015-12-16 22:19, Peter Oh wrote: [...] >>> If mentioned to use the function to mesh frame only without touching >>> mac80211, then how do you suggest it to apply it only to mesh frame >>> without interfere other data frames? >>> Can you share your example? >> >> It's trivial - in ath10k_tx you do this: >> >> if (vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT && >> skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) >> skb_checksum_help(skb); > > Thank you Felix for the quick response. > I agree on your user experience opinion, > but what do you think when ath10k has a new chip supporting HW checksum for > Mesh? You can simply introduce a fw-feature flag saying "supports_mesh_csum_offload" later and skip the skb_checksum_help() if it's set. Michał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
