On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:20:14AM +0800, yfw wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On 2015年11月10日 22:13, Bob Copeland wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:08:53PM +0800, fengwei.yin wrote: > >>Even on 3620, not all cmds switch to wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2. > >>And I don't think wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 should bind to 3620 (it > >>may be related with firmware). > >> > >>In patch v2, the wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 is not bind to 3620. If > >>you could test on none-3620 platform (I don't have none-3620 plafrom), that > >>will be great. > > > >Sure, I'll take a look today or tomorrow on my hardware. > > > > Ping... Oops, sorry. I can confirm my hardware uses this format. Turns out, in my backports snapshot I was already carrying a patch for it: https://github.com/KrasnikovEugene/wcn36xx/commit/7d41270b8c3eee0f72713b4553ca047807c0a00e -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
