On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:02:41AM -0500, Yin, Fengwei wrote: > From: Andy Green <andy.green@xxxxxxxxxx> > > From: Andy Green <andy.green@xxxxxxxxxx> > > On wcn3620, firmware response to trigger_ba uses the new, larger > "v2" format > - ret = wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check(wcn->hal_buf, wcn->hal_rsp_len); > + ret = wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2(wcn, wcn->hal_buf, > + wcn->hal_rsp_len); It's unclear from the changelog -- is it safe to call wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 on the 3660/3680 as well? Is wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check() still needed? -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
