On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 12:37 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > The currently identified use cases do not seem to care much about the > actual result of this command since there is going to be a wait for > the > scan completed event anyway and the call is not even used unless > there > is a known ongoing scan. As such, even the difference of a driver > supporting this command or not is not that significant taken into > account this is used only as an optimization to speed up the > following > operation when a long scan operation was in progress. Things work > fine > (though without that speed benefit) even if the driver does not > support this. Anyway, making cfg80211 advertise whether the new > command > is available could obviously be done should someone come up with a > use > case that depends on knowing that the optimization is available. > Fair point. In that case though, making the driver operation void would make sense. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
