On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2 July 2015 at 10:43, Eliad Peller <eliad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> [please try to send w/o html if you're CC'ing the linux-wireless list] >>> >>> > To me this looks like a race in hostapd. The station should be >>> > installed to driver _before_ sending Assoc Resp frame, not after. My >>> > quick-n-dirty hack seems to help: >>> > >>> [...] >>> > Is anyone aware of this problem already? Anyone working on it? Any >>> > gotchas I should be aware of before I go into fixing this in a proper >>> > way? Or am I missing something and this isn't actually a problem? >>> >>> The TI folks had a similar patch that broke open networks, not sure >>> what was wrong there. >>> >> there was some implementation error. it was fixed later on. >> >> also, take a look at this thread: >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/88421 > > Thanks! Looks like you guys hit this with EAPOL frames. I'll look into it more. > > Is there any particular reason why these TI-OpenLink patches weren't > submitted/merged to hostap? > nothing particular, AFAIR. they needed further review/cleanup before upstream, and we just didn't get to it. Eliad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
