On 2 July 2015 at 10:43, Eliad Peller <eliad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> [please try to send w/o html if you're CC'ing the linux-wireless list] >> >> > To me this looks like a race in hostapd. The station should be >> > installed to driver _before_ sending Assoc Resp frame, not after. My >> > quick-n-dirty hack seems to help: >> > >> [...] >> > Is anyone aware of this problem already? Anyone working on it? Any >> > gotchas I should be aware of before I go into fixing this in a proper >> > way? Or am I missing something and this isn't actually a problem? >> >> The TI folks had a similar patch that broke open networks, not sure >> what was wrong there. >> > there was some implementation error. it was fixed later on. > > also, take a look at this thread: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/88421 Thanks! Looks like you guys hit this with EAPOL frames. I'll look into it more. Is there any particular reason why these TI-OpenLink patches weren't submitted/merged to hostap? Michał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
