On 15 April 2015 at 19:10, YanBo <dreamfly281@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Janusz Dziedzic
> <janusz.dziedzic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 15 April 2015 at 00:45, YanBo <dreamfly281@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Janusz Dziedzic
>>> <janusz.dziedzic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Don't disable PS while we are not connected.
>>>> In other case we will get higher power consumption.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 8 +++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>>>> index 52c5b1f..b896dd4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>>>> @@ -1730,7 +1730,13 @@ static int ath10k_mac_vif_setup_ps(struct ath10k_vif *arvif)
>>>> enable_ps = false;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - if (enable_ps) {
>>>> + if (!arvif->is_started) {
>>>> + /* enable power save mode while not connected,
>>>> + * in other case after iface up we will get
>>>> + * higher power consumption - firmware design
>>>> + */
>>>> + psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED;
>>>> + } else if (enable_ps) {
>>>> psmode = WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED;
>>>> param = WMI_STA_PS_PARAM_INACTIVITY_TIME;
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>
>>> What the expectation behavior after we enable the
>>> WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED at Idle status?
>>> Is there any effect for TX or RX chain after set it?
>>>
>>
>> First I think that WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED is important only when we
>> are connected.
>> But, I see current consumption drop in my test environtment from 88mA
>> to 33mA when:
>> 1) load driver, iface up
>> 2) disconnect network, iface down, iface up
>> So, seems WMI_STA_PS_MODE_ENABLED do something more in FW (not only
>> standard PS enable/disable when
>> connected to AP). Probably someone from FW team should answer that, if
>> that is a feature or a bug.
>>
> I guess the chip enter Idle mode power save after set this, did you
> run the the
> test on QCA61XX or QCA 98XX? Can it still auto scan to get all the APs around
> it, cause for IMPS mode it will only looks in its existing profile
> list and sends a probe request,
> with SSID specified in profile for what I know
>
I see iw scan works correctly after iface up (same scan results like ath9k):
In my laptop I have 3 cards
wlan0 - ath9k
wlan1 - QCA9888
wlan4 - QCA6174
janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan0 scan dump|grep SSID |wc -l
0
janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan0 scan |grep SSID| wc -l
21
janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo ifconfig wlan0 down
janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan1 scan dump|grep SSID|wc -l
0
janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan1 scan |grep SSID|wc -l
21
janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo ifconfig wlan1 down
janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan4 scan dump|grep SSID|wc -l
0
janusz@dell6430:~$ sudo iw wlan4 scan |grep SSID|wc -l
22
Should I run any other scan tests?
BR
Janusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
