On 04/15/2015 05:41 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Peter Oh <poh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
As for your patch at hand, I tested it for ETSI and it does not
change detector performance,
The patch is useful when there are many missing pulses within a burst.
It happens almost every time when channel loading rate is higher than
40%, but around 30% channel loading does not miss pulses that much.
therefore (please replace 16 with PRI_TOLERANCE in the macro)
I'll do.
Acked-by: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
So what's the conclusion? Should I wait for v2 or is this good to
commit? I didn't quite get Zefir's comment about PRI_TOLERANCE above.
Please wait for 2nd patches. I'll prepare the patches that do not void
this current products certificate.
Regards,
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
