Peter Oh <poh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> As for your patch at hand, I tested it for ETSI and it does not >> change detector performance, > > The patch is useful when there are many missing pulses within a burst. > It happens almost every time when channel loading rate is higher than > 40%, but around 30% channel loading does not miss pulses that much. > >> therefore (please replace 16 with PRI_TOLERANCE in the macro) > > I'll do. > >> Acked-by: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@xxxxxxxxxxx> So what's the conclusion? Should I wait for v2 or is this good to commit? I didn't quite get Zefir's comment about PRI_TOLERANCE above. -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
