From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:31:19 +0200 > Am 10.04.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Joe Perches: >> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 23:57 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> The printed values are all of type unsigned integer, therefore use >>> %u instead of %d. Otherwise an user can face negative values. >> >> Hey Richard. >> >> Just to clarify, this patch is for net and not for net-next >> as net-next has removed the seq_printf return uses. >> >> Are you going to submit an equivalent patch for net-next? > > Hmm, you are right. It took me a few minutes to figure out what happened > because I did rebase my patches to net-next and fixed up 5/5 already. > Reading yesterday's bash history shows that I've used > git format-patch in a wrong way such that the comments from the old > branch were taken. I'm waiting for you to respin this series against net-next, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
