Am 10.04.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Joe Perches: > On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 23:57 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> The printed values are all of type unsigned integer, therefore use >> %u instead of %d. Otherwise an user can face negative values. > > Hey Richard. > > Just to clarify, this patch is for net and not for net-next > as net-next has removed the seq_printf return uses. > > Are you going to submit an equivalent patch for net-next? Hmm, you are right. It took me a few minutes to figure out what happened because I did rebase my patches to net-next and fixed up 5/5 already. Reading yesterday's bash history shows that I've used git format-patch in a wrong way such that the comments from the old branch were taken. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
