Thank you! Seems reasonably for me.
The question is not related to the thread:
May be this is not very good idea to copy behavior from other
tools but what do you think about
add the same ability to use named network namespaces as it is
done in iproute2 - from /var/run/netns ?
Thanks,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 11:07 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote:
>
>> Would you please explain why wireless devs related to the same phy
>> can't live in separated network namespaces ?
>
> Well, they interact very deeply, for example the # of virtual interfaces
> is often severely limited, and they often have to be using a single
> channel, etc. It thus doesn't really make sense to try to separate them.
>
> Also, if you really want to use it reliably, you should use a single
> hostapd or wpa_supplicant process controlling all virtual interfaces,
> which clearly isn't possible in multiple network namespaces.
>
> johannes
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
