On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2014-12-24 at 11:48 +0200, Vadim Kochan wrote: > >> 1) Set NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL for phy wireless device only if there >> is at least one virtual interface which was created on it > > You mean at least two? I'd think the behaviour becomes hard to predict, > but I guess ultimately that'd be somewhat reasonable. > >> 2) What about to inherit netns for newer created interfaces from >> the phy device ? > > Hmm? This already happens - a given phy is only in a single netns and > all interfaces must be created in the same netns. > > johannes > Hi, Would you please explain why wireless devs related to the same phy can't live in separated network namespaces ? Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
