On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 12:03 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2015-01-07 11:41:55, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 11:19 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Do we need following patch on top of > > > 24a0aa212ee2dbe44360288684478d76a8e20a0a revert? > > > > > > I updated kernel today, and (probably because extensions were not > > > selectable before), the default choice was "N", which is wrong: > > > oldconfig should result in compatible choices being made, for example > > > to help bisect. > > > > I don't believe we need this. It has been defaulting to N for a long > > time, it's just that it got thrown out of your config due to building > > inbetween the patch and its revert. Had you built only before and after > > that wouldn't be an issue. > > Well, I clearly hit the issue. If someone had _not_ build in between, > the "default y" does not change anything for him, as he will not be > asked thequestion. If someone starts config from scratch, Y is the > safe answer. We've long stated that if really starting from scratch it's the wrong thing to do and had a default N, so I don't really know why we'd revert that only to make a short period of bisect slightly happier? I really don't want to merge this patch and encourage more people to build with wext enabled. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
