On Wed 2015-01-07 11:41:55, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 11:19 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Do we need following patch on top of
> > 24a0aa212ee2dbe44360288684478d76a8e20a0a revert?
> >
> > I updated kernel today, and (probably because extensions were not
> > selectable before), the default choice was "N", which is wrong:
> > oldconfig should result in compatible choices being made, for example
> > to help bisect.
>
> I don't believe we need this. It has been defaulting to N for a long
> time, it's just that it got thrown out of your config due to building
> inbetween the patch and its revert. Had you built only before and after
> that wouldn't be an issue.
Well, I clearly hit the issue. If someone had _not_ build in between,
the "default y" does not change anything for him, as he will not be
asked thequestion. If someone starts config from scratch, Y is the
safe answer.
> If we default to Y now we send the wrong signal. If you really need to
> bisect something wext related you have far bigger issues I'd think, the
> code hasn't changed *forever*.
I am woried about bisecting something unrelated, and then wext coming
and breaking the bisect. But you are right that it will break the
bisect, anyway...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
