On 11/24/2014 02:53 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> @@ -2537,6 +2560,17 @@ static int __ath10k_set_antenna(struct ath10k *ar, u32 tx_ant, u32 rx_ant)
>>> ar->cfg_tx_chainmask = tx_ant;
>>> ar->cfg_rx_chainmask = rx_ant;
>>>
>>> + ht_cap = ath10k_get_ht_cap(ar, true);
>>> + vht_cap = ath10k_create_vht_cap(ar, true);
>>> +
>>> + if (ar->phy_capability & WHAL_WLAN_11G_CAPABILITY)
>>> + ar->mac.sbands[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ].ht_cap = ht_cap;
>>> +
>>> + if (ar->phy_capability & WHAL_WLAN_11A_CAPABILITY) {
>>> + ar->mac.sbands[IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ].ht_cap = ht_cap;
>>> + ar->mac.sbands[IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ].vht_cap = vht_cap;
>>> + }
>>
>> So this modifies stryct wiphy::bands after we have called
>> ieee80211_register_hw(). Is this something which both cfg80211 and
>> mac80211 support? I didn't find the documentation mentioning anything
>> about this so I got a bit worried.
>
> Johannes mentioned me that this is not supported so I am reluctant to
> take these. Unless I'm missing something, of course.
I did test the code, and it seems to work fine. But, I could
be missing some subtle issues.
Any idea how this is supposed to be done?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
