Michal Kazior wrote: > Yes. Basically peer->keys[] should be protected by both conf_mutex and > data_lock if you want to modify it. If you want to read it you need > either one. Ok. > Thanks! Looks like the `cancel_work_sync(&arvif->wep_key_work);` > should go _before_ `mutex_lock(&ar->conf_mutex);`. > > I'm busy with some stuff so feel free to send a patch :-) I'll send a fix after this one. Thanks for the review ! Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
