On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 16:56 +0100, Henning Rogge wrote: > Hi, > > the only reason why nobody noticed is that the "iw" tool does not even > check the cmd field of the kernel replies it process. I wonder if "iw" > should check the value, just to make sure bugs like this are easier to > detect. It doesn't really have to since it's not processing events on the same socket ... but maybe we should just add some sanity checks. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
