On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Helmut! > > Helmut Schaa wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 09/10/14 03:26, Sourav wrote: >>>> We are using Ralink chip Rt3072L (using rt2800usb drivers rt2800usb.c), >> >> The Ralink USB hardware is quite bad in reporting TX status and as >> such minstrel_ht cannot do proper rate selection. > > Rate control of the vendor driver seems to work just fine (or at least > better as minstrel_ht). Indeed, the ralink proprietary rate control does not depend on per frame statistics. > > Iow: minstrel_ht doesn't meet the requirements of ralink chipsets :-). Yep. > But this is not the only problem of rt2800usb. As long as a driver has > the ability to damage a device [1], there is something more basically > broken! Also agreed. Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
