On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 14:39 +0000, Will Newton wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Johannes Berg > <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > +For some ethernet hardware that cannot DMA to unaligned addresses like > > +4*n+2 or non-ethernet hardware, this can be a problem, and it is then > > +required to copy the incoming frame into an aligned buffer. Because this is > > +unnecessary on architectures that can do unaligned accesses, the code can be > > +made depend on CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS like so: > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > > + skb = copy skb > > +#else > > + skb = original skb > > +#endif > > Is this logic reversed? Euh, indeed, thanks. Will repost after having more comments. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
