On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > +For some ethernet hardware that cannot DMA to unaligned addresses like > +4*n+2 or non-ethernet hardware, this can be a problem, and it is then > +required to copy the incoming frame into an aligned buffer. Because this is > +unnecessary on architectures that can do unaligned accesses, the code can be > +made depend on CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS like so: > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CAN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > + skb = copy skb > +#else > + skb = original skb > +#endif Is this logic reversed? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
