On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 09:43:38AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Can you say *why* we want this? Does it yield better behaviour on a > Cisco deployment? Yes. The basic idea is: When your density goes up (many clients, many access points), the 2.4 GHz band becomes very crowded and you get interference across cells. The controller observes this (by seeing that the APs see each other too strongly), and reduces the transmit power to reduce the cell size. (This might be counterintuitive, because people's initial idea for better Wi-Fi usually involves turning power _up_, but that only makes the problem here worse, since the problem is interference, not range.) It then also asks the clients to do the same (through DTPC), because the clients' traffic of course also contributes to the interference. We should honor its request, just as we honor it when it comes through 802.11h or 802.11d. If the controller detects that this creates coverage holes, it will turn the power back up and just live with the interference. Like the subject says, this is part of CCX (Cisco's set of wireless extensions), so as far as I know, any CCX-certified driver, e.g. Intel drivers on Windows, already support this. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
